Veterinary

RCVS plans for review of ‘under care’ and 24/7 cover guidance

The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) has published further details about its plans for a review of its guidance to the veterinary professions on ‘under care’ and out-of-hours emergency cover. 

The review, announced earlier this year, was recommended to the Council by its Standards Committee following its “lengthy and detailed” exploration of the implications of new technologies for both animal health and welfare and veterinary regulations. 

The main areas under consideration include the provision of 24-hour emergency cover and the interpretation and application of an animal being under the care of a veterinary surgeon.

Related Articles

The initial stages of this review had been drafted for Standards Committee to consider at its meeting on 9 September, where the outline timetable was also discussed.

The review will include a broad timetable for the review’s three key phases of evidence gathering, policy drafting, and public consultation.

The review will comprise several key stages and is expected to take around 12 months to complete. The outline timetable, which may be subject to change, is as follows:

  • October – January: six-week call for evidence, followed by independent qualitative analysis of all evidence received
  • February – March: Select Committee-style meetings and independent qualitative analysis of additional evidence gathered 
  • April – June: Consider all evidence and draft any new policy
  • July – August: Six-week public consultation on draft policy
  • September – October: Independent review of consultation responses, and production of any proposals for change
  • November: Finalise any proposals for change and publish any new guidance

Melissa Donald, Standards Committee chair, said:“This is set to become one of our most fundamental reviews of RCVS guidance in recent years.

“Considering the complexity of the issues in question, and their importance to animal owners and the professions alike, it is vital that we allow ourselves enough time to ensure this review is as thorough and comprehensive as possible.”

She added: “We have a clear responsibility to seek, understand and, where we can, accommodate the opinions and experiences of as many different people from within and around the professions and the public as possible.”

Back to top button